Day 2 Homework

Headline

Day 2 content lands extremely well (81.1% rated it 5 stars, 129/159) and comprehension checks are mostly strong, but two recurring confusions — the "past vs. current data" fill-in-blank and "buy zone" setup — show specific teaching gaps worth fixing before Day 3.

What the numbers say

• Overwhelming approval: 81.1% gave 5 stars, average 4.75/5 (129/159; only 1 response below 3 stars)
• TPS method retention is strong: Trend 97.5% (155/159), Pattern 96.9% (154/159), Squeeze 94.3% (150/159) correctly identified
• Daily candle concept is well understood: 91.2% correctly said "1 trading day" (145/159)
• The technical-analysis fill-in-blank is the weak spot: only 69.2% chose "Past" (110/159); 25.8% chose "Current" (41/159) — a real comprehension gap, not just noise
• TradingView adoption has room to grow: 39.6% already use it (63/159), 34.6% have not signed up (55/159), 7.5% signed up during this session (12/159), 18.2% use another platform (29/159)
• Audience skews toward existing paying members: 82.4% are current Profit Surge Trader members (131/159); of those, 49.6% are Annual (65/131), 33.6% Inner Circle (44/131), 16.8% Unlimited (22/131)
• Perceived value of the service is split but trends positive: 42.4% of members value it at $1,000+ (56/131 combined for $1,000–2,000 and $2,000+ bands... actually: $1,000–2,000 16% + $2,000+ 16% = 32%, 42/131), while 42.8% value it under $500 (56/131 combined for $0–100 and $100–500)

In their own words

Buy zone confusion (recurring theme): "Still fuzzy on buy zone - but will go back to watch yesterday's recording."

Trade-plan / patience payoff: "Make a plan, stick to it, and be patient! This resonated well with me, as this morning I closed a trade with a $10 profit in fear of losing money on yet another option trade, only for it to gain $130 more within the 15 minutes."

Scheduling/accessibility pain point: "I cannot monitor trades all day. Should I not try to trade your recommendations? I'm not doing so great, because I don't always catch your stc posts in time to catch a good profit. Prices usually drop very fast after I see your post."

Delta/Greeks confusion: "Can you go over the deltas and the other Greeks explanation on how they affect our Options selection?"

Long-term member loyalty: "Every moment is an AHA moment since I have been a member."

What to do about it

• Re-teach the technical-analysis definition explicitly on Day 3 — call out the "past vs. current data" distinction directly, since a quarter of respondents (41/159) got this wrong. This is a foundational term; letting it slide will compound confusion later.
• Add a short, dedicated segment or downloadable guide on "how to find and confirm the Buy Zone" — this came up unprompted in both the AHA and Nate-question fields, suggesting it's one of the most-confused concepts in the curriculum.
• Produce a basic "Options Greeks / Delta for beginners" explainer — multiple verbatim questions ask about delta/Greeks specifically in the context of strike selection; this is a clear content gap, not a one-off.
• Create a TradingView quick-setup guide (EMAs 8/21/55, squeeze indicator) and push it to the 34.6% (55/159) who haven't signed up yet — several respondents explicitly asked how to replicate Nate's chart setup.
• Address the "can't watch live" segment with a concrete workaround (e.g., alert automation, end-of-day recap, or a lower-frequency trade tier) — this is a recurring complaint tied to lost profits, and a direct product/feature response could reduce churn risk among members who feel they're "doing everything wrong."
• Mine the $1,000+ value responses (42/131) for testimonial/upsell material when marketing Unlimited or Inner Circle tiers; separately, the $0–500 segment (56/131) may be a good target for a retention or down-sell conversation before renewal.

Caveats

• Completion rate was 67.1% (159 of 237 started) — roughly a third dropped before finishing; no way to tell from this data whether dropout concentrated on any particular question, but it should be watched in future surveys.
• The membership-type and value questions were only shown to self-identified members (131 of 159); this is expected branching logic, not a data-quality problem, but readers should not treat 131 as the full sample for those two questions.
• Free-text fields ("AHA moment," "questions for Nate") contain a high proportion of null-content answers ("No," "N/A," "."), which inflates response counts without adding insight — true thematic signal comes from the substantive minority.
• All findings are observational/self-reported; no causal claims should be drawn from the value or satisfaction figures.